Comparable companies are a crucial part of financial analysis. When evaluating the financial health of a company, it is often important to compare it to similar companies in the same industry or market. This allows investors and analysts to better understand the performance of the company and make informed investment decisions.

How do you choose comparable companies? When selecting comparable companies, several factors should be considered to ensure a meaningful and relevant analysis. Some of the important factors include the same or similar industry, company size, market share, geographic presence, financial metrics, business models, customer base, product portfolios, and competitive positioning. Ultimately, a comprehensive and thoughtful evaluation of these factors allows for the identification of the most suitable peers, enabling a more accurate and meaningful benchmarking analysis.

For a more detailed explanation of how to select peer companies, access our free whitepaper on peer selection here. 

Below, we will explore some of the most important criteria in more detail and provide practical tips and recommendations for selecting comparable companies.

What are Comparable Companies?

Comparable companies are companies that operate in the same industry or market and have similar financial metrics, such as revenue, earnings, and market capitalization. They can be used as a benchmark to evaluate the financial performance of a company and to determine its relative value.

Choosing Peers Based on Industry Classification

Industry classification is a fundamental criterion in selecting comparable companies. Companies that operate in the same industry are more likely to have similar financial metrics and face similar market conditions. Therefore, it is useful to identify the appropriate industry classification system and use it to identify comparable companies. Widely used industry classification systems are the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) and the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). GICS is used globally, while NAICS is used primarily in North America.

When selecting comparable companies based on industry classification, it can be important to choose companies that operate in the same sub-industry or industry as the target company. This may ensure that the financial metrics and market conditions are comparable and provide meaningful insights into the financial health of the target company.

By using the appropriate classification system and identifying companies in the same sub-industry or industry, this often helps ensure the companies are a good comparison.

Selecting Peer Companies Based on Size

Size and market capitalization are important criteria in selecting comparable companies. Companies that are similar in size and market capitalization are more likely to have similar financial metrics and face similar market conditions. Therefore, it is important to determine the appropriate size and market capitalization range when selecting comparable companies.

Size can be measured in terms of revenue or assets. Companies with similar revenue or assets are more likely to be comparable. For example, if the target company has revenue of $500 million, then it would be appropriate to select comparable companies with revenue in the range of $400 million to $600 million.

Market capitalization is the total value of a company’s outstanding shares of stock. Companies with similar market capitalization are more likely to be comparable. When selecting comparable companies based on market capitalization, it is important to choose companies with market capitalization in the same range as the target company. For example, if the target company has a market capitalization of $1 billion, then it would be appropriate to select comparable companies with market capitalization in the range of $800 million to $1.2 billion.

Choosing Peers Based on Geographic Location

Companies that operate in the same geographic region are more likely to face similar market conditions and regulations. Therefore, it is important to consider the geographic location of the target company and where possible select comparable companies that operate in the same region.

When selecting comparable companies based on geographic location, it is important to consider both the country and the region within the country. For example, if the target company is based in the United States, then it would be appropriate to select comparable companies that are also based in the United States. However, if the target company operates primarily in the Northeast region of the United States, then it would be appropriate to select comparable companies that also operate in the Northeast region.

In addition, it may be important to consider the cultural and language differences when selecting comparable companies in different regions. For example, companies that operate in Japan may have different business practices and cultural norms than companies that operate in the United States. Therefore, it is important to take these factors into account when selecting comparable companies.

Using Financial Metrics to Select Companies

Companies with comparable financial metrics such as revenue growth, profitability ratios, and leverage ratios are preferred as they provide better grounds for meaningful comparisons. These metrics help ensure that the chosen peers have similar financial performance, which is crucial for meaningful valuation comparisons.

When comparing financial metrics, it is advisable to focus on those that directly impact valuation multiples commonly used in CCAs, such as EV/Sales, EV/EBITDA, P/E, and EV/EBIT. Some key financial metrics to consider include:

Revenue Growth:
Comparing the revenue growth rates of peer companies helps assess their market position, ability to generate sales, and potential for future expansion.

Profitability Ratios:
Metrics such as operating margin, net profit margin, and return on equity (ROE) provide insights into the profitability of peer companies. Higher profitability may indicate better operational efficiency and competitive advantage.

Leverage Ratios:
Evaluating debt-to-equity ratio, interest coverage ratio, and other leverage metrics helps assess the financial risk and capital structure of peer companies. Comparable leverage ratios ensure a fair comparison of valuation multiples.

Growth Potential:
Metrics related to growth potential, such as research and development (R&D) expenditure or investment in new technologies, can provide insights into a company’s ability to innovate and capture future market opportunities.

Cash Flow Metrics:
Analyzing metrics such as operating cash flow, free cash flow, and cash conversion cycle helps assess a company’s ability to generate cash and manage its working capital efficiently.

Business Model and Operations

The business model and operations of a company play an important role in determining its financial performance. When selecting comparable companies, it is important to consider companies with similar business models and operations to the target company.

To identify companies with similar business models, investors and analysts should consider the following factors:

Industry and product focus:
Companies in the same industry or with a similar product focus are likely to have similar business models. For example, two companies in the software industry may have similar business models even if they serve different markets or use different technologies.

Sales channels and distribution:
Companies with similar sales channels and distribution networks may have similar business models. For example, two companies that sell products through e-commerce channels may have similar business models even if they sell different types of products.

Revenue streams:
Companies with similar revenue streams may have similar business models. For example, two companies that generate most of their revenue from subscription-based services may have similar business models even if they serve different markets.

Competitive advantage:
Companies with similar competitive advantages may have similar business models. For example, two companies with strong brand recognition and customer loyalty may have similar business models even if they operate in different industries.

When selecting comparable companies based on operations, investors and analysts should consider the following factors:

Supply chain:
Companies with similar supply chain operations may have similar operations. For example, two companies that rely on just-in-time inventory management may have similar operations even if they produce different products.

Production processes:
Companies with similar production processes may have similar operations. For example, two companies that use automated production lines may have similar operations even if they produce different products.

Cost structure:
Companies with similar cost structures may have similar operations. For example, two companies that have high fixed costs and low variable costs may have similar operations even if they operate in different industries.

Management practices:
Companies with similar management practices may have similar operations. For example, two companies with a strong focus on innovation and R&D may have similar operations even if they operate in different industries.

A Final Note on Choosing Comparable Companies

Selecting a group of peer companies for a Comparable Company Analysis (CCA) involves careful consideration of multiple factors. By evaluating these factors, investors can ensure that the chosen peer companies closely resemble the target company, providing meaningful benchmarks for valuation analysis. Ultimately, a well-selected group of peer companies enhances the accuracy and reliability of the CCA, enabling more informed decision-making regarding the valuation and investment potential of the target company.

Want to find an easier way to select peer companies, then try the Valutico platform. Book Your Demo here.

The post How to choose Comparable Companies appeared first on Valutico.